Is the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is a wonderful alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for individuals who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some Eightvape Coupon are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they are currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that people who use their product to lose weight can easily do so if they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they are in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert that allows one to put it into the mouth area, which means that you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you may go. If the product also offers an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that while there is no ash made by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes have to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.
And also the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes in the marketplace could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research suggests that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with the ones that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the number of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government may have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor will there be a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The only thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.